Senior Citizen party-list representative Rodolfo Ordanes took to the House of Representatives to advocate for the updating of a critical law that impacts persons with disabilities (PWDs) in the Philippines. The legislation, known as Batas Pambansa 344, also called the Accessibility Law, has been in place for over four decades. Ordanes emphasized the necessity of revising this law to accommodate not just PWDs but also senior citizens, children, and members of the LGBTQIA community.
Ordanes argued that the essence of the law should evolve in line with societal changes and the growing awareness of the diverse needs of individuals with disabilities. The law, in its original form, mandated that buildings and public facilities be accessible to physically challenged individuals. It required architectural features like ramps and accessible restrooms in public buildings and transportation systems.
The representative from the Senior Citizen party-list cited the necessity for revisions to the law’s implementing rules and regulations (IRR) to broaden its scope. Ordanes proposed that the law should consider the inclusion of advancements in technology that can aid in accessibility. This would mean that new public infrastructures would integrate more sophisticated accessibility features, ensuring that people with disabilities can access these facilities without barriers.
Ordanes also addressed the need to align the law with international standards. He noted that countries across the globe are enhancing their accessibility measures. By aligning the law with global standards, the Philippines can achieve greater inclusiveness for all individuals, especially those who are often marginalized due to physical limitations.
In addition to enhancing physical infrastructure, Ordanes proposed that the amendments should also focus on digital accessibility. The rapid increase in digital technology usage has exposed inequality in access for PWDs. The amendments could mandate that digital platforms used by government agencies and businesses provide accessible features for PWDs, enabling them to access essential services and information.
The proposed revisions aim to include more comprehensive guidelines that detail how businesses and public services should cater to individuals with disabilities. Ordanes suggested that compliance with these guidelines should be strictly monitored to ensure that the objectives of the law are fulfilled. Non-compliance could result in penalties to enforce adherence.
Ordanes’ proposal received attention from various advocacy groups. They echoed the need for an updated legal framework to improve the quality of life for PWDs. Advocacy groups stressed that an inclusive approach could foster a community where everyone, regardless of their physical abilities, has equal opportunities and access.
The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), a key government agency, is anticipated to play a crucial role in implementing changes if the amendments are approved. They would be responsible for ensuring that new building projects and public infrastructure align with the revised accessibility standards.
