WASHINGTON, D.C. — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday for a public oversight hearing examining the Department of Justice’s handling of records related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Lawmakers from both parties questioned Bondi about the preservation, review, and release of case materials connected to Epstein and individuals associated with him.
Bondi delivered an opening statement under oath, outlining DOJ policies on case files, record retention, and legal restrictions on disclosure. She cited federal privacy rules, grand jury secrecy provisions, and ongoing investigative protocols, emphasizing that department staff follow internal guidelines and federal law when determining what information can be released.
Committee members pressed Bondi on the status of specific Epstein-related files, asking whether any documents had been sealed, redacted, or withheld beyond legal requirements. Bondi said the department must balance transparency with privacy protections for victims, cooperating witnesses, and third parties. She also described DOJ protocols for communicating with victims and their representatives about case developments and document handling.
Bondi confirmed that any credible allegations of misconduct are subject to existing review procedures. Representatives also sought details on coordination with state and local authorities and how joint task forces and sharing agreements affect access to investigative files.
The hearing addressed prior decisions in Epstein-related cases, including charging choices and plea arrangements, and how these decisions influence current record availability. Bondi cited legal rules governing past cases and court orders, noting the department’s obligation to comply with them.
Committee members raised questions about Freedom of Information Act requests, public interest in the files, and safeguards against destruction or loss of records. Bondi explained the department’s FOIA review process and its archival systems for maintaining materials. She stressed that deviations from established retention rules would be considered violations subject to review.
The session concluded with both the committee chair and ranking member requesting follow-up documentation from Bondi. They indicated ongoing oversight of Epstein-related files and DOJ record-handling practices, with the hearing record remaining open for additional written questions from lawmakers.
The hearing was broadcast live, allowing the public to follow testimony and questions in real time.
