Comelec Investigates Bautista-Smartmatic Bribery Case

INQUIRER PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE

MANILA, Philippines — The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has begun its own investigation into a bribery case involving its former chair, Andres Bautista, and Smartmatic, the company that supplied voting machines for the 2016 elections.

Comelec Chair George Garcia discussed the issue in an interview with ANC on Monday. He stated that the agency is closely following Bautista’s ongoing trial. Bautista is accused of accepting millions of pesos in bribes from Smartmatic during his tenure. The allegations have raised questions about the integrity of the electoral process and the handling of public funds involved in the procurement of the voting technology.

Garcia emphasized that Comelec aims to ensure transparency and accountability throughout this investigation. The agency is committed to upholding the public’s trust in election processes and the fairness of operations. The outcome of the investigation could have significant implications for the electoral commission, Smartmatic, and all involved parties.

Smartmatic has faced scrutiny in the past regarding its role in Philippine elections. The company has provided services and technology for multiple election years, and allegations of bribery have intensified scrutiny over its business practices. The current investigation seeks to clarify the nature of the relationship between Bautista and Smartmatic during the 2016 elections.

The Commission has started to gather information and evidence related to the case. Garcia noted the importance of a thorough investigation and reiterated the agency’s dedication to confronting any wrongdoing. As the investigation proceeds, Comelec aims to promote a fair electoral environment.

The trial against Bautista will take place in a court of law, where evidence and testimonies will be presented. Public interest remains high as many citizens are keen to understand the facts surrounding the allegations. The Commission on Elections has assured the public that it will remain impartial during the process and will act based on the findings of the investigation.

Related posts

PAOCC Spokesperson Dismissed After Viral Slapping Incident

SC Fines Judge for Delayed Justice

COA Audit Reveals Deficiencies in OVP’s Secret Fund Receipts